Risk of uterine rupture following locked vs unlocked single-layer closure.


  • Publication date : 2013-02-15

Reference

Hudic I, Bujold E, Fatusic Z, Roberge S, Mandzic A, Fatusic J. Risk of uterine rupture following locked vs unlocked single-layer closure. Med Arch. 2012;66:412-4. PubMed PMID: 23409524.

Additional information

Lien vers PubMed

Keywords

abdominal wound closure techniques adult cesarean section, repeat female humans pregnancy risk suture techniques uterine rupture

Abstract

To compare the rate of uterine scar disruption after a locked versus an unlocked single-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision at a previous cesarean.A retrospective cohort study in a population where both locked and unlocked single-layer closure are commonly used. All singleton pregnancies at 24 weeks' gestation or more with a previous single cesarean were included. Rate of uterine scar disruption (complete uterine rupture and uterine scar dehiscence) were compared between women with a previous locked and those with a previous unlocked single-layer closure of the uterus.Out of 388 women included in the study, 272 had a previous unlocked single-layer closure and 116 had a locked single-layer closure. We found no significant difference in the rate of uterine scar disruption between the two groups (5.9% vs 8.6%, p = 0.32).Locking a single-layer closure was not associated with an increase rate of uterine scar disruption at the next pregnancy in our retrospective analysis. A randomized trial should be performed.